NUTRITIONAL VALUES FOR COMMON WHEAT AND KAMUT BRAND
WHEAT
|
Common Wheat a. |
Kamut Brand Wheat b. |
PROXIMATE: |
||
Water |
11.5% |
9.8% |
food energy/100g
(calories) |
335 |
359 |
Protein |
12.3% / 14,0% |
17.3%/19,6% |
total lipid (fat) |
1.9% |
2.6% |
carbohydrate |
72.7% |
68.2% |
crude fiber |
2.1% |
1.8% |
ash |
1.66% |
1.82% |
MINERALS:
(mg/100g) |
||
calcium |
30 |
31 |
iron |
3.9 |
4.2 |
magnesium |
117 |
153 |
phosphorus |
396 |
411 |
potassium |
400 |
446 |
sodium |
2.0 |
3.8 |
zinc |
3.2 |
4.3 |
copper |
0.44 |
0.46 |
manganese |
3.8 |
3.2 |
VITAMINS:
(mg/100g) |
||
thiamin (B1) |
0.42 |
0.45 |
riboflavin (B2) |
0.11 |
0.12 |
niacin |
5.31 |
5.54 |
pantothenic acid |
0.91 |
0.23 |
vitamin B6 |
0.35 |
0.08 |
folacin |
0.0405 |
0.0375 |
vitamin E |
1.2 |
1.7 |
LIPIDS: (g/100g) |
||
saturated |
0.303 |
0.550 |
16:0 (palmitic acid) monounsaturated |
0.225 |
0.400 |
18:1 (oleic
acid) polyunsaturated |
0.733 |
1.580 |
18:2 (linoleic acid) |
0.035 |
0.125 |
cholesterol 18:3
(linolenic acid) |
0.0 |
0.0 |
AMINO ACIDS:
(g/100g) |
||
tryptophan |
0.194 |
0.117 |
threonine |
0.403 |
0.540 |
isoleucine |
0.630 |
0.600 |
leucine |
0.964 |
1.23 |
lysine |
0.361 |
0.440 |
methionine |
0.222 |
0.250 |
cystine |
0.348 |
0.58 |
phenylalanine |
0.675 |
0.85. |
tyrosine |
0.404 |
0.430 |
valine |
0.624 |
0.800 |
arginine |
0.610 |
0.860 |
histidine |
0.321 |
0.430 |
alanine |
0.491 |
0.630 |
aspartic acid |
0.700 |
0.980 |
glutamic acid |
4.68 |
5.97 |
glycine |
0.560 |
0.650 |
proline |
1.50 |
1.44 |
serine |
0.662 |
0.930 |
a. Agriculture
Handbook No. 8-20, “Cereal Grains and Pasta” 1988, pp 20071-20076.
b. Medallion Laboratories’ Analytical Report No. 88011589 done for Montana
Flour & Grains on Kamut brand wheat
Summary of the nutritional comparison of wheat versus Kamut Grain:
As an overall summary, it can be said that Kamut brand grain has higher nutritional value than the
common wheats. The most striking superiority is found
in the protein level of this grain. Kamut brand wheat
is also significantly higher in total lipids. Since lipids are higher in energy
than carbohydrates and proteins, Kamut brand wheat
can be described as a high-energy grain. The vast majority of the nutrition in
this grain, however, is in the form of complex carbohydrates whose value in the
diet is well documented.
Because Kamut
brand wheat is made up of such a large seed (about 2-3 times the size of a
normal wheat kernel), the ratio of the seed coat to the seed volume is less than
other wheats. The proportionately less seed coat area
explains why the percent of fiber which is found in the bran located in the
seed coat is a little less than in the smaller kernels of the other wheats.
The ash is an indication of total
minerals present. Again Kamut brand wheat has
measurably more of eight out of the nine minerals usually found in wheat. Kamut brand grain has significantly more magnesium and zinc
than the average wheat.
When vitamins are compared, there
is no trend. Of the seven vitamins normally found in wheat, Kamut
brand wheat has higher concentrations of four and lower concentrations of
three. It is of interest to note, however, that there is 30 percent more
vitamin E in Kamut brand wheat.
Kamut
brand grain has significantly higher levels of all the major fatty acids
usually found in wheat. Of course like all wheat, Kamut
brand wheat has no cholesterol. Kamut brand grain
also has higher levels of sixteen out of the eighteen amino acids usually found
in wheat. The concentrations of six amino acids are 34-65 percent higher in the
Kamut brand grain than in the average wheat. These
amino acids are threonine, cystine,
arginine, histidine,
aspartic acid and serine.
There is one other significant
difference between Kamut brand wheat and average
grains in the USDA report. That difference is the moisture content. The low
moisture is characteristic of grain grown under dry land conditions of the
western end of the northern
Protein: quantity and quality matter:
Note: Protein content calculation differs between US and
The base of conversion is: Protein %
Qualities: For most of ancient wheats, proteins are
in greater quantity and of very good nutritional quality.
Table 2 shows a comparison of certain essential amino acids in common wheat
(bread wheat), spelt, einkorn and Kamut® grain. Spelt
seems to be very close to common wheat but einkorn and Kamut®
grains are richer.
Table : Protein and essential amino acid
rate of ancients and common wheat:
|
Common wheat |
Spelt (T. spelta)(1) |
Einkorn |
Kamut® grain |
Protein (% / dm) |
12 |
12,8 |
14,5 |
19,6 |
Lysine (%) |
0,28 |
0,22 |
0,44 |
0,44 |
Methionine (%) |
0,16 |
0,14 |
0,19 |
0,25 |
Threonine (%) |
0,24 |
- |
- |
0,54 |
Kamut wheat and wheat allergy:
Research by the IFAA
(International Food Allergy Association) concludes as follows: “For most people
who are hypersensitive to wheat, Kamut wheat can be
an excellent substitute for common wheat”.
Two groups of
people, those with an immediate immune reaction and those with a delayed immune
reaction. In this last group, 70% showed an increased sensitivity to common
wheat than Kamut wheat. In the first group – people
with serious allergies – 70% did not react, or did react very slightly, with Kamut wheat.
注意:純粹作資料參考。8-12-04。http://health4u.hk